DEUTSCHES OPERN FORUM   DIE UNIVERSALE STIMME DER AKADEMISCHEN WISSENSCHAFT IN DER OPER
ARCHIVE – MEDICINE

Home

Introduktion zur Universität der Zukunft

Projekte

Peter Hübner’s Cosmic Educational Program

Peter Hübner
Developer of the
University of the Future

ARCHIV

MEDICINE

Nature’s Laws of Harmony in the Microcosm of Music

Chronobiology

The Ear as a Medical Instrument

The Special Status of the Ear in the Organism

Music as a Harmonic Medical Data Carrier

Music and Brain

The Significance of the Soul to Medicine

The Significance of the Soul in Human Evolution

The Significance of Our Consciousness to Medicine

The Future of Pharmaceutics

The American Institute of Stress

World Health Organization (WHO)

Republic of Belarus

Stress - The Epidemic of Modern Society

The Unborn Child

Baby Care Unit

Harmonic Therapy

The Benefits of
Harmonic Information

The Social-Medical Significance of Medical Resonance Therapy Music

Headache Migraine

Modern Medication

Intensive Care Unit

How does the Medical Resonance Therapy Music function

Chernobyl









Page  1 2
Harmonic Therapy of Digital Pharmaceutics
Ques­tion: What re­sults have your stud­ies pro­duced?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: We were able to ob­serve that sev­eral pa­rame­ters of the vege­ta­tive nerv­ous sys­tem un­der­went change under the in­flu­ence of Huebner’s Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic. For ex­ample, the hor­mone beta-en­dor­phin, the body’s own mor­phine, comes close to nor­mal status as a re­sult of the mu­sic treat­ment. Thus, this mu­sic has a har­mo­niz­ing ef­fect.

Head­aches, for in­stance, got bet­ter, sleep be­came deeper and the pa­tients sim­ply felt bet­ter as a re­sult of this ther­apy with the mu­sic. In other pa­tients, there were im­prove­ments in prob­lems like for­getfulness, lack of ori­en­ta­tion, nerv­ousness and lack of con­cen­tra­tion.

Ques­tion: Did lis­ten­ing to Mozart also have this ef­fect?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: Lis­ten­ing to Mozart led to the ac­ti­va­tion of bod­ily func­tions, and this runs con­trary to the proc­ess of re­laxa­tion.

When Peter Hübner’s Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic was used, we also saw an ac­ti­va­tion of the opioid sys­tem, which ex­plains the re­duc­tion in pain and the im­prove­ment in sleep ex­peri­enced by many pa­tients. Opioids are sub­stances in our body that one might call the body’s own opium.

This also ex­plains why many pa­tients of both sex felt very much bet­ter whilst lis­ten­ing to and also af­ter hear­ing the mu­sic.

Ques­tion: Could this also be the physio­logi­cal ex­plana­tion for the fact that some lis­ten­ers feel ex­tremely happy when lis­ten­ing to Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: Yes, that could be one of the rea­sons.

Ques­tion: Is the suc­cess of the mu­sic de­pen­dent on the mu­si­cal knowl­edge and train­ing of the lis­tener?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: No, suc­cess was evi­dent, com­pletely in­de­pend­ent of the pa­tients’ mu­si­cal and gen­eral edu­ca­tion.

Ques­tion: You are now work­ing with a team of 10 re­search­ers on dif­fer­ent stud­ies with the mu­sic. Which re­sult has had the great­est im­pres­sion on you so far?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: Ac­tu­ally, all of the re­sults with Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic are im­pres­sive, but there was one re­sult which was so clear, it really sur­prised us. We ex­am­ined moth­ers who were lis­ten­ing to the mu­sic dur­ing la­bor and saw that the child in the womb relaxes to such an ex­tent that it seems to sleep. This sur­prised us all.

This is a very posi­tive ef­fect, as this har­moni­za­tion of the mother and child, brought about by lis­ten­ing to the mu­sic, is not only re­liev­ing for the mother but also serves to coun­ter­act the trauma of birth for the child. And to­day it is pre­cisely such trauma which is held re­spon­si­ble for many sub­se­quent dis­or­ders the child may suffer. What also im­pressed us is the fact that the mother’s en­ergy dur­ing birth is clearly in­creased by the mu­sic, on av­er­age by 75%, and this serves to coun­ter­act any dan­ger­ous weakening of the mother dur­ing the birth.





Prof. Dr. med. A. Reznikov
in con­ver­sa­tion with pro­fes­sors and stu­dents fol­low­ing his lec­ture at the medi­cal fac­ulty of the Uni­ver­sity of Hei­del­berg
We know that these ef­fects occur, but we still do not know pre­cisely what it is that spe­cifi­cally hap­pens, and this is what we want to find out with our con­tinu­ing re­search.

Ques­tion: What is it about the mu­sic that works in the way you de­scribe? The sounds, the har­mon­ies or the rhythm?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: The most im­por­tant thing about Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic that in­flu­ences the hu­man or­gan­ism is proba­bly its en­tirely natu­ral struc­ture, based strictly on the natu­ral laws of har­mony of the mi­cro­cosm of mu­sic – which in­deed, ac­cord­ing to old medi­cal sys­tems, also gov­ern bio­logi­cal life.

Ques­tion: Sur­veys con­ducted among more than ten thou­sand lis­ten­ers of the mu­sic in Berlin and Frank­furt re­vealed that approx. 90% said they like the mu­sic very much. How­ever, some said they were not able to re­late to the mu­sic and, in fact, a few said they could not bear the calmness, the or­der and the har­mony of the mu­sic.
So did some of your pa­tients have dif­fi­cul­ties with the mu­sic?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: A few pa­tients ini­tially ex­peri­enced a slight worsening of their head­aches, and there­fore did not want to lis­ten to the mu­sic. We were, how­ever, able to per­suade them to lis­ten to the mu­sic nev­er­the­less – for if the physi­ol­ogy is in dis­or­der, it is quite likely that the regu­la­tory proc­esses which be­gin could well be found un­pleas­ant.

By the fourth day, at the lat­est, these peo­ple ac­tu­ally re­quested the mu­sic them­selves, be­cause in the meantime, they had felt its bene­fi­cial regu­la­ting ef­fects, and in­stead of worsening, their head­aches had sig­nifi­cantly im­proved. If a lis­tener finds natu­ral har­mony un­pleas­ant, it sug­gests that his or­gan­ism is work­ing dis­har­moni­cally, and then it really is time to rec­re­ate a natu­ral or­der, and it is just such a per­son for whom Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic can then be of great bene­fit.

Ques­tion: So what posi­tive ef­fects does this mu­sic have on healthy peo­ple, and is it suit­able for all peo­ple?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: Yes, ac­cord­ing to cur­rent re­sults of sci­en­tific stud­ies this mu­sic is, with­out a doubt, suit­able for eve­ryone. One can per­haps sum up by saying that the strong point of this Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic for the healthy per­son lies in the fact that it ef­fec­tively counters stress fac­tors pre­sent in the body.
And nowa­days this is cer­tainly a very use­ful thing. Both my fam­ily and I my­self there­fore use it. Many peo­ple suffer from poor sleep or have head­aches, lack con­cen­tra­tion or have many other gen­eral com­plaints as a re­sult of be­ing under stress. Here Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic can really do a good job: one can deeply relax with it at home and ef­fec­tively dis­tance one­self from the stresses of eve­ry-day-life.

Ques­tion: How should one go about do­ing that? Whilst ly­ing down, sit­ting com­forta­bly in an armchair or whilst do­ing some light housework?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: One should lis­ten to the mu­sic whilst re­laxed and ei­ther sit­ting down or ly­ing. It is hardly pos­si­ble to do any­thing else at the same time. It is very pleas­ant to lis­ten to it in the eve­ning in bed be­fore going to sleep, but also – if your col­leagues do not ob­ject – dur­ing the day at work, for ex­ample. Best would be to relax to the mu­sic three times a day for 30 min­utes.

Ques­tion: That is quite a lot. Would a shorter time suffice?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: As I al­ready said, three time a day is best; but lis­ten­ing just once a day in the eve­ning is often enough. It is defi­nitely good to lis­ten to Medi­cal Reso­nance Ther­apy Mu­sic® af­ter the stress of the day, in or­der to re-har­mon­ize the dis­rupted vi­tal func­tions. Those around you and your own body will be very grate­ful.

And: one should per­haps not nec­es­sar­ily ex­pect con­ven­tional ar­tis­tic pleas­ure, as this un­usual mu­sic pur­sues, in a mu­si­cal sense, new paths. The com­poser has not con­ceived it as a con­ven­tional work of art, but as a sci­en­tifi­cally based reso­nance me­dium for the health-pro­mot­ing en­er­gies of na­ture.

Ques­tion: In the same way, per­haps, that: he who drinks spa wa­ter should not ex­pect wine or whisky or vodka?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: Yes, for some tastes per­haps in this di­rec­tion. But one should not for­get that re­nowned mu­si­cal ex­perts acknowl­edge this as mu­sic of the high­est mu­si­cal stan­dard and enjoy it as a new mu­si­cal ex­peri­ence.

Ques­tion: Are your stud­ies con­tinu­ing?

Prof. Dr. med. Reznikov: Yes, cer­tainly, the re­sults to date have in­spired us to deepen our knowl­edge in the dif­fer­ent fields. It is also a case of mak­ing re­newed use of an an­cient natu­ral branch of medi­cine in our pre­sent time and put­ting it in the ser­vice of our health. This is a challenging task.


<<