PETER HÜBNER:  ... and: that it is able to satisfy an educated person intellectually as well as emotionally.
For in particular many educated scientists of all colors do not like at all that version of many neuroscientists of our time – who want to make out thinking so exclusively to be a function of the brain and in doing so deny the soul.

NATURE MEDICINE CURRENT AFFAIRS:  When the scientific studies in the field of medicine prove satisfactorily, that in our inner world it is the soul, which has the highest natural position of power, then science will soon also teach, that it is foolish, to violate this power.

PETER HÜBNER:  And also your question, „how do you find out, whether you violate the will of the soul?“ is very easily answered then under the protection of objective science: you recognize it by the fact, that health gets worse – it is that simple. For this we do not have to consult our conscience. It is certainly practical to leave all that systematically-logically in the medical field.

NATURE MEDICINE CURRENT AFFAIRS:  Mr. Hübner, the following point I did not yet understand:
“Artificial intelligence” you call everything, what in the mental-emotional field comes from the outside to the inside – in opposite to “natural intelligence”, which structures my thinking and my mind from inside.

But in every communication – and most notably in the process of learning – I cannot help to also take up mental-emotional information from outside. That is, I can not hinder that my mind comes into contact with “artificial intelligence” – what then in turn – according to your explanations – leads to these many problems.
There cannot be a person who does not take up information from outside – whose flow of information is always only directed from inside to outside, or what do you think?

PETER HÜBNER:  As I already emphasized: natural intelligence always works from inside to outside – this is a law of nature. On this all evolution is based. But it does not mean, on the other hand, that, when it has worked from inside to the outside, it can in turn not be effective from the outside to the inside – for natural intelligence works everywhere at any time and also in any direction –, in terms of space as also in terms of time, as also in terms of space-time integration.

I mean here the following: a teacher, who wants to pass on knowledge, must have this knowledge himself authentically.
But if we want to call it “knowledge” according to the highest standards we can think of, respectively: according to natural standards, then this knowledge must have a universal character as well as a cosmic one – as for instance the knowledge about the harmony laws of the microcosm of music. That is, the teacher has to gain the knowledge there, where it naturally has a universal and cosmic character – due to the level of creation or also the level of consciousness where it is gained. In a natural way all knowledge has universal character on the level of the self: whatever knowledge I draw from the self, on the level of the self – by structure it always has a universal character in a natural way. The reason is, that the self is the first natural: individual expression of universality.